Source Acquisition Guide
This guide is for readers, librarians, engineers, historians, and independent researchers who find a Steinmetz book, paper, lecture, patent, diagram, archive record, or scan that should belong in the archive.
The short rule is simple: bring the source into custody before asking the archive to decode it. A title, a rumor, a bibliography entry, or an unsourced quotation can be useful as a lead, but it is not yet a decoded source.
The priority queue is the current source expansion wave: hysteresis, complex quantities, general circuit equations, magnetic forces, lightning, impulse currents, cable discharge, arcing grounds, and patents.
What Counts As Source Custody
Section titled “What Counts As Source Custody”A source is in usable custody when the archive can point to a stable object that a future reviewer can inspect again.
| Custody Level | Examples | How It May Be Used |
|---|---|---|
| Public scan or full text | Internet Archive scan, HathiTrust public view, Google Books public-domain scan, institutional PDF, official patent record. | Can enter OCR, section mapping, figure review, formula review, and public source-reader generation. |
| Authority record only | DOI page, library catalog record, finding aid, bibliography citation. | Can become an acquisition or finding-aid page, but not a decoded source. |
| Local scan supplied by contributor | Public-domain PDF, page images, photographed pamphlet, typed transcription with scan evidence. | Can be considered if rights are clear and page provenance is preserved. |
| Unverified quotation | Forum quote, AI answer, unsourced blog excerpt, unattributed equation image. | Can be logged as a lead only. It cannot support a public claim. |
Metadata To Submit
Section titled “Metadata To Submit”Include as much of this as possible:
- Full title exactly as printed or cataloged.
- Year, edition, volume, issue, proceedings title, patent number, or archive collection identifier.
- Creator, editor, conference, journal, publisher, or institutional custodian.
- Stable authority link: DOI, Internet Archive, HathiTrust, Google Books, Open Library, Google Patents, USPTO, library record, or finding aid.
- Rights note: public domain, public scan, restricted access, unknown, or contributor-supplied scan.
- Why it matters: concepts, equations, diagrams, patents, historical context, Tesla-era overlap, or field-language value.
- Known defects: missing pages, low-quality OCR, duplicate edition, damaged scan, incomplete plate, or uncertain title page.
If you provide a local file, keep its original filename visible and include where it came from. A checksum is ideal once the file enters the repository.
Processing Path
Section titled “Processing Path”Every serious source should move through these gates:
- Registered source lead.
- Custody confirmed through a public scan, local public-domain file, official patent record, or archive finding aid.
- OCR or text extraction created and preserved.
- Page, chapter, lecture, article, or patent-section map created.
- Concept, glossary, quote, formula, and figure candidates extracted.
- Source reader and source overview generated with verification warnings.
- Scan checks promote exact quotations, formulas, and diagrams.
- Concept pages, math pages, visual galleries, and comparison pages receive source-grounded updates.
Until step 7, formulas and OCR passages remain candidate material. This archive deliberately avoids pretending damaged OCR is verified mathematics.
Priority Targets
Section titled “Priority Targets”The archive most needs source custody for these high-value works:
How To Submit
Section titled “How To Submit”The easiest path is the GitHub source-intake form. If GitHub is not convenient, use the contact links on the contribution page and include the same metadata.
One precise source lead is better than a large loose list. It lets reviewers preserve custody, rights, edition, page, and processing status without confusion.
What Not To Do
Section titled “What Not To Do”Do not paste long copyrighted text into an issue. Do not submit a modern paraphrase as if it were Steinmetz’s wording. Do not mix Tesla, Wheeler, Dollard, or ether-field interpretation into the source-custody layer. Those comparisons may become useful later, but the first job is always to know exactly what Steinmetz wrote, where, and in which edition.
Why This Matters
Section titled “Why This Matters”The archive is becoming useful because it is open and careful at the same time. Source acquisition is the hinge between those two virtues. The more complete the custody trail, the stronger every future concept page, equation page, diagram, glossary entry, hidden gem, and interpretive boundary becomes.