Skip to content

Comparison Index

Comparison pages keep the archive balanced. They are not places to collapse Steinmetz into modern textbook language, Tesla-era invention, or later ether-field interpretation. They are places to ask a stricter question: when two vocabularies look related, what exactly is shared, what is merely analogous, and what remains unverified?

Comparison rule: every strong comparison must be passage-by-passage, equation-by-equation, diagram-by-diagram, or explicitly labeled as a research hypothesis.

Comparison pages are maps, not verdicts. Each page must keep these layers separate:

LayerWhat It Can SayWhat It Must Not Do
Steinmetz source layerWhat the processed Steinmetz text, equation, diagram, patent, or report actually supports.Smuggle in a modern or ether-field conclusion without citation.
Modern engineering layerPresent-day electrical-engineering equivalents, notation, and terminology.Dismiss older language merely because it is not modern textbook language.
Historical comparison layerParallels and differences with Tesla-era or early field-science vocabulary after source passages are located.Treat shared vocabulary as proof of shared theory.
Interpretive layerCarefully labeled ether-field, Wheeler-style, Dollard-style, or other nonstandard readings.Present interpretation as something Steinmetz explicitly stated.